If H3 happens it should be added to MCC, not Infinite. Just like H2A.
Forums / Games / Halo Infinite
Halo 3 Anyversary in Halo Infinite
I never knew why you were called the Comedic Hermit. Now I do!Comedic Hermit wrote:Releasing an h3a as part of a three parts removed sequel doesn't make sense. If they were going to add it to an existing game it would make more sense to do it on MCC. They've already stated there are no plans for an H3A, though I personally feel it will be released in the year 3007. If I'm wrong, feel free to contact me in 3008 and I'll apologize.
You didn't even read my comment I bet, just fixated on that one quote and couldn't wait to respond with a novel of why the game will be bad and whatever else. Also, your example makes no sense with Anthem as that isn't a first party game. Has Xbox leadership and 343i leadership failed? Probably so. But lets be candid here, Bungie had lots of issues through there runs with the Halo games. Lets not pretend that 343i are the only one who mess up and make bad decisions in some capacity. Decisions were made about switching engines and the games scale is probably a lot bigger than initially planned. Game development is an ever evolving process. Nothing is ever in black and white. The decisions made hurt them and they had to delay the game for it (also the negative reception of the trailer was the nail in the coffin). All I am saying is good for them for making the good decision to delay and the game will be great on launch because of it. Stop lying to yourself believing that another 4 months+ past initial November ship won't help.JACK BURT0N LSG wrote:This post has been edited by a moderator. Please refrain from making non-constructive posts.*Original post. Click at your own discretion.