This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not flame or attack other members. This includes stat-flaming.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
"This is yet another lie from you, head on over to page 122 and you'll see the oldest post of mine on this thread, it's 11 posts down and it was posted on 4/24/2019, which is well over 3 months ago. "
read again. i said last 3 months. you last wrote on a different thread 3 months ago. i have no doubt youve had this account on this thread for years.
perhaps you are 2 different people but you are very similar with tedious arguments.
"Well if it's just my opinion then you should have little trouble breaking down why it's wrong."
fine. i'll do it just once but i'm not gonna keep breaking down celestis weak points just because you support it. soon i will have to ignore you too unless you think for yourself.
i'll post my counter arguments tomorrow. i'm going to bed.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
Spoiler:
Showhaha all very suss. so you barely played halo 5. sounds like your opinion on it doesnt hold much weight then huh. thanks for admitting that,Nuss902928 wrote:"didnt read any of that."Ryan lfc 92 wrote:didnt read any of that. your account has no halo 5 play time. youve only replied to this thread in the last 3 months. You are celestis second account arent you? you even talk petty like him. arent there forum rules about having multiple accounts. ;)Nuss902928 wrote:"the classic give me proof and even if there is proof its not relevent line. lol. its my opinion."Ryan lfc 92 wrote:"Citation needed please, I don't recall Celestis ever making such a claim, and even if he did that doesn't make it so. "Nuss902928 wrote:Citation needed please, I don't recall Celestis ever making such a claim, and even if he did that doesn't make it so.Ryan lfc 92 wrote:celestis shouldnt act like he represents the anti sprinters then. All his points are generally weak and not worth my time replying to anymore.Nuss902928 wrote:Way to generalize every single argument against sprint based off of the weakest argument from a post which made 8 different arguments, that definitely doesn't make you look extremely disingenuous and petty.Ryan lfc 92 wrote:"If you added sprint to a small map such as Lockout, the players would constantly run into walls because of the reduced turn radius."
this is the laughable level of reasoning 343 has to deal with. I dont even have to say anything. anti sprinters defeat themselves.
Also you can't claim that he isn't worth your time responding to when you continue to snipe at him with your petty mini responses after already claiming beforehand that you were no longer going to respond to him.
And lastly his points are mostly strong, the fact that you only even tried (and failed) to counter one of his last eight points is evidence of that.
the classic give me proof and even if there is proof its not relevent line. lol. its my opinion.
"Also you can't claim that he isn't worth your time responding to when you continue to snipe at him with your petty mini responses after already claiming beforehand that you were no longer going to respond to him."
i didnt respond to him. i used him as an example to the rest of the the forum users
"And lastly his points are mostly strong"
in your opinion
"the fact that you only even tried (and failed) to counter one of his last eight points is evidence of that."
the evidence is, ive stated i'm not responding to him. i didnt even try to counter anything. i pointed out a stupid quote of his for the rest of the forum users, to which one anti sprinter agreed with.
your arguments are petty.
You made a specific claim about Celestis's supposed representation of anti sprinters, you provided nothing to back this up, and the reason why any direct quote that you brought me would not matter is because Celestis has no authority over anybody else's arguments. Even if he said that he was king of the anti sprinters, that wouldn't mean anything because just calling yourself the king doesn't make you the king.
"i didnt respond to him. i used him as an example to the rest of the the forum users"
Oh so you're openly admitting that you're the one who decided that he represents all anti sprinters.
"in your opinion"
Well if it's just my opinion then you should have little trouble breaking down why it's wrong.
"the evidence is, ive stated i'm not responding to him. i didnt even try to counter anything. i pointed out a stupid quote of his for the rest of the forum users, to which one anti sprinter agreed with"
So you don't want to counter or even have a meaningful discussion with his arguments, instead you just want to cherry pick and laugh at what you think are his weakest points in order to mock all arguments against sprint. Wow, what a wonderful contribution to what has been at many points a very interting thread with lots of in depth discussion.
"your arguments are petty."
If my unwillingness to allow you to drag the opinions and arguments of all anti sprinters through the mud with one cherry picked quote from a man who you can't even be bothered to talk to is petty, then I guess I am petty.
This is the second time now (the first time was with Tassi) that you've tried to personally write somebody off as unworthy of your attention because you didn't like a few things that they said and followed up by making up lies about them, so forgive me if I'm being a bit hostile with you.
Thanks for openly admitting right away that you're engaging in bad faith.
"your account has no halo 5 play time"
That's right, because I didn't waste my money on it after playing my brother's copy and at Halo Outpost discovery in Chicago and seeing how awful it was.
"youve only replied to this thread in the last 3 months"
This is yet another lie from you, head on over to page 122 and you'll see the oldest post of mine on this thread, it's 11 posts down and it was posted on 4/24/2019, which is well over 3 months ago.
"You are celestis second account arent you? you even talk petty like him. arent there forum rules about having multiple accounts."
I assure you I am not Celestis, although you're cowardly attempt to completely sidestep all my criticisms with such an absurd accusation is not unexpected. Do you also think that I'm Tassi because I've defended him from you as well?
"This is yet another lie from you, head on over to page 122 and you'll see the oldest post of mine on this thread, it's 11 posts down and it was posted on 4/24/2019, which is well over 3 months ago. "
read again. i said last 3 months. you last wrote on a different thread 3 months ago. i have no doubt youve had this account on this thread for years.
perhaps you are 2 different people but you are very similar with tedious arguments.
"Well if it's just my opinion then you should have little trouble breaking down why it's wrong."
fine. i'll do it just once but i'm not gonna keep breaking down celestis weak points just because you support it. soon i will have to ignore you too unless you think for yourself.
i'll post my counter arguments tomorrow. i'm going to bed.