??? What I’m dying 😂 did you really bring my rank into the discussion lol. First I’m far from a diamond lv player that’s what playing my 10 games got me on top of that I’ve beaten plenty of champions so what’s the point in ranked if Most of them not all of them are bad. Trust and believe I’m far from a noob am I up there wit yoda, almi, rock or any other top top player no but I can guarantee you I’m far from average. If you looking at the first thing you see when you inter my service record it’s wrong dig a little deeper in the matches I play are either team war or customs.Trust me, high tier play the rangers were useless, they could barely kill CT marines. the rangers now are where they should be. they are level 2 anti infantry and if you're good at micro a sniper will kill ranger's, or put them weak at the least, at diamond where you are they might seem op as people aren't as effective at microing or juggling units, but in high onyx and champ people never just run infantry after their opener as they are easy to counter, people will run them with vehicles and maybe air and focus fire the few ranger squads with hogs or tanks, pull the vehicles out, then send infantry in followed by the vehicles.Swerve LC wrote:Snipers will never beat rangers till the tech 3 upgrade the tech 2 upgrade is next to useless imo and should be taken out or be given as a free BYou do raise a good point on hunters vs marines, nut i still believe rangers are in a good spot for a tech 2 anti infantry. Snipers work differently as well, they focus on high single target damage by dropping 1 unit in a squad a shot and have mass range, rangers are a brawling tier 2 unit, play snipers at there strengths and they drop rangers.Swerve LC wrote:They are the same price as snipers yet poop on snipers. Secondly unsc has zero infantry to compete with CT marines, hellbringers, and sniper all get pooped zero contest. Ranger nerf is needed. You need to go vehicle but then it makes an easy transition to warhogs impossible because hunters are also good which banished never needed the ranger with the CT nerf. Just because they are a tech 2 unit doesn’t mean they need to break infantry for unsc it’s almost no point in going infantry when you see elite rangers getting pumped outWhy would you want to nerf rangers ? they're a tech 2 anti infantry unit that are fairly high priced, plus think of it on a lore level a 3 man sangheili squad with carbines are gonna cause damage to grunt's/marines.I JG Fox I wrote:Are we ever going to nerf rangers? Buff tech 3 upgrade for both cyclops and hunters? Maybe buff wolverines. Can we at least know what the plan is.
doesnt have anything to do with balance at all if you want to bring lore in a hunter will poop on marines zero contest my point exactly lore shouldn’t be involved with balanced tho it should involved in what unit type the said unit is that’s it
buff the unsc the only place the win is in the air and revers are good and air it self is beyond bad.
test it out for your self sniper don’t compete with rangers at all. Rangers were in a good spot before the im update suicide grants deal the damage while rangers clean it up. It also doesn’t take away that the banished have two forms of anti infantry and both of them beyond effective
Secondly rangers are by far the stongest infantry unit in the game where it shouldn’t be because not only do banished have suicide grunts to do good amount of damage but now they got a broken unit. They are to strong
On top of all that no crap people play with diverse units. But what ever infantry comp you got will lose to rangers it does matter if you micro what you have. It needs a nerf