So I read alot of threads about hate and support against Halo 5 to be considered as a worthy Halo title.
When I read these threads, many people say Halo needs to evolve, it needs change. Many people say it diesn't need these new game mechanics and art style.
So I just wanted to make a thread about, do you like the classic type of Halo or do you like the new type of Halo?
It's not the mechanics of H5 that I do not like. The Halo series has been evolving since the beginning. Halo CE introduced Shields, two weapons only, and vehicles to the shooter genre. H2 introduced dual wielding and hijacking, as well as introducing matchmaking as a whole. H3 had equipment you could throw down (and the end of the Flood that we know of...). H: ODST introduced firefight, H: Reach introduced armor abilities, H4 introduced sprint, and H5 introduced Spartan Charge, ground pound, and smart scope.
I'm not against change. What I do not like (not liking is an understatement) about H5 is how misleading the advertising for the story was. They LIED that Cortana wasn't coming back, and that Chief was going rouge.
That was not the case (as everyone knows).
The multiplayer was very bare bones (mostly fixed now). The theater still is very buggy (since the beginning). People don't like the art style because Halo's art style was more gritty, and now it looks like plastic. And everything in H5 is random, from map rotation, to what armors you unlock. I like to wear armor that you earn. that's why I have Mark 6 Gen 1 helmet and Nightfall (yes, I watched Nightfall) armor equipped (as of now).
Personally, I like the older halo's. The Recon didn't look bad, and actually meant something. 343i is trying to make it their halo game but while they make the games, the games belong to the fans. They need to remember that.