As a generic fps he gave it an 8, a 3 for a halo title is bad
All in all here's how i score Halo 5:So... Based on your own rating of "8/10" Halo is a good game.
As a generic FPS: 8/10
As a Halo Title: 3/10
I understand the concept of a game not being as "Halo", but regardless you've rated Halo 5 as being 8/10. That's still a fairly high score.
I just don't understand your criticism and your ratings.
You guys are missing the point...
8, is a good score. Generic FPS or not. If he indeed rates it as 8, then it means he really likes the game.
But then he rates it 3/10 as a Halo game, which should indicate that he doesn't like it at all. AT ALL. Generally, anything below 5/10 is a game that you do not want to play. Period.
On one hand, OP rates it 8/10 ("generic FPS", whatever he thinks that means) indicating that he likes it. A lot.
On the other he rates it 3/10 (as a "Halo title") indicating that it is not only a chore to play, but painfully bad.
Which is it? Does he hate the game, or like it
? Stop with this "as a Halo game
" nonsense. I understand the concept of a game feeling like a Halo game, but the differences in his scoring method is irreconcilable.
His attempt at a dual rating system is terrible and weakens any argument he tries to put forth.