Forums / Games / Classic Halo Games

No Halo 3 Anniversary?!?! NOOOO!

OP Helios738

  1. 1
  2. ...
  3. 2
  4. ...
  5. 3
Honestly all H3 really needs redone is Forge, and not even the entire forge just add Rotation Snap, Physics (fixed/phased/normal), and Edit Coordinates and it'd be the perfect Halo for me.
WSerg wrote:
WSerg wrote:
anniversary only makes sense 10 years afte the first release. but i think a halo 3 remaster/ultimate/whatever can still happen.

the biggest problem i see would be, that 343i and/or MS fear, that the sales of h6 could be really bad so they sell it only in a bundle, like activision did with infinite warfare and modern warfare remaster, or like they already did themself with halo wars 2 and halo wars definitive edition.

i don't know about the sales of h5 (many say it sold really well while others state it sold poorly) and i don't think that really matters, because they see the success of the modern warfare remaster and halo 3 could have the same potential to boost h6 sales. i hope this doesn't happen, but the way the games industry is heading it wouldn't surprise me (and it wouldn't even surprise me if they add MTs to a halo 3 remaster in some way)
And then there are those of us who only want Halo 6 and NOT Halo 3A. If they bundle them, that may jack up the price, which would piss a lot of us off.
Why don't you want H3A just curious
For one, it's unnecessary. We need to focus on new games and not remake old ones. If I still want to play the old ones, I pop it into my Xbox, not play the new ones. Second, everyone acts like remakes are the "greatest things in the world" and won't shut up about them. All I hear these days is people talking about Halo CEA or Halo 2A. They act like those are the only games and the originals didn't exist, and if you don't like them then you are weird. Third, if they bundle these games with other ones, they can jack up the price and that would suck because I am not going to want to pay more than $60 for a game if another game I don't want is with it. If they do decide to make these remakes, they need to be separate.
WSerg wrote:
WSerg wrote:
anniversary only makes sense 10 years afte the first release. but i think a halo 3 remaster/ultimate/whatever can still happen.

the biggest problem i see would be, that 343i and/or MS fear, that the sales of h6 could be really bad so they sell it only in a bundle, like activision did with infinite warfare and modern warfare remaster, or like they already did themself with halo wars 2 and halo wars definitive edition.

i don't know about the sales of h5 (many say it sold really well while others state it sold poorly) and i don't think that really matters, because they see the success of the modern warfare remaster and halo 3 could have the same potential to boost h6 sales. i hope this doesn't happen, but the way the games industry is heading it wouldn't surprise me (and it wouldn't even surprise me if they add MTs to a halo 3 remaster in some way)
And then there are those of us who only want Halo 6 and NOT Halo 3A. If they bundle them, that may jack up the price, which would piss a lot of us off.
Why don't you want H3A just curious
For one, it's unnecessary. We need to focus on new games and not remake old ones. If I still want to play the old ones, I pop it into my Xbox, not play the new ones. Second, everyone acts like remakes are the "greatest things in the world" and won't shut up about them. All I hear these days is people talking about Halo CEA or Halo 2A. They act like those are the only games and the originals didn't exist, and if you don't like them then you are weird. Third, if they bundle these games with other ones, they can jack up the price and that would suck because I am not going to want to pay more than $60 for a game if another game I don't want is with it. If they do decide to make these remakes, they need to be separate.
Like H2A Looked Amazing I personally would just like that level of detail in my favorite halo
The reason why they did halo combat evolved anniversary and halo 2 anniversary was cea was the first halo game ever to release 2001 and was a huge success while halo 2 anniversary was just a marketing ad for halo 5. Plus I don't want halo 3 anniversary it's perfect in the way it is in 2007 graphics so stop asking. " if your greedy jousts go to a dlc map on halo 3 forge and put in juicy and gloomy effects and save it! It's so easy even a simple grunt and a mindless brute can do it"
I myself wanted a Halo 3 Anniversary, but now that the time has passed, I'm fine without it. It would have been cool, but I don't think it's absolutely necessary.
It’s only because it is mcc though
Halo 3 deserves a proper Anniversary, The Original H3 game ( All of it ) in 60 fps with the graphical upgrade of mcc. Original Ranking system and playlist. Take Halo 3 off of MCC and stop the backwards compatible H3 so the entire H3 population is consolidated into one game. those who want h1, h2, h2a and h4 have the MCC and those who want halo 5 have halo 5. If you took out H3 from the MCC it would make a lot of those happy who feel like all of the cross game playlist are over loaded with H3.
Halo MCC Graphics and 60 fps with the entire og halo 3 ( All playlist and ranking system ) take halo 3 backwards compatable off and take halo 3 off of the mcc and this would funnel all Halo 3 players to the new halo 3 with the amazing graphics of mcc and the 60 fps with all the playlist and the same old ranking system.

This post has been hidden.

0
Halo 3's art style is the only thing that makes it look good after 10 years, every other aspect of its graphics is extremely dated. I want a Halo 3 Anniversary, but the odds of it still happening are slim. Who knows, maybe it will be added to the MCC next year as a gift(paid or otherwise) once they finish fixing the collection. But I'm not getting my hopes up.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not post spam.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
Spoiler:
Show
No Halo 3: Anniversary! Which means no Halo 3: ODST Anniversary! :(
  1. 1
  2. ...
  3. 2
  4. ...
  5. 3