Over all who do you think is better John 117 or the oni assassin spartan jameson locke.
Chief VS Locke
An acquisition specialist isn't a detective. Locke's more of a John Wick rather than a Sherlock Holmes.
Yeah, I understand that. I was more relating it to all the clue finding-like things you do as Locke did in game.tL Armada wrote:While I believe that Chief would generally come out on top, I do think people are undermining Locke's skill as well. Chief's been at this whole warfighting thing for quite a while and knows his stuff, absolutely, but Locke was specifically sent after Chief and Blue team because of his own skill and experience. He was noted as being a rather potent ONI agent, and further honed his skills upon induction into the Spartan-IV program.
Chief's had longer training and more years of experience, which sets him above Locke, but don't underestimate Locke's potential.An acquisition specialist isn't a detective. Locke's more of a John Wick rather than a Sherlock Holmes.
Perhaps I misinterpreted what you originally meant by investigator. I'd say it would definitely be something Chief, and Spartans in general, would find important, however. Putting the pieces together to fully understand one's quarry is a useful tool to employ.Yeah, I understand that. I was more relating it to all the clue finding-like things you do as Locke did in game.tL Armada wrote:
Even if Locke was John Wick, Wick wouldn't be able to stand against the nuclear blast that is the Master Chief.
It's like people need to reaffirm that their hero I still the best.shinigami 7 T wrote:I’m a little bothered that people still ask this question, especially because of the scene in Halo 5, when you simply just have to look at their stats with common sense. Locke isn’t a scrub compared to Chief, but Chief would be able to defeat him with not too much effort.