Your most disliked helmet in Halo

ManiacalSpark wrote:

Pretty much every helmet that 343i has made. The only exception to this is Chief's helmet in Halo 4.

Like wow dude.

Though I gotta say I prefer the BUNGiE era rogue helmet. I know some helmets changed style a bit when 343i took over, but seriously that was too much.

Halo 3 vs 4-5

ManiacalSpark wrote:

baconsam5283 wrote:

ManiacalSpark wrote:

Pretty much every helmet that 343i has made. The only exception to this is Chief's helmet in Halo 4.

Like wow dude.

Though I gotta say I prefer the BUNGiE era rogue helmet. I know some helmets changed style a bit when 343i took over, but seriously that was too much.

Halo 3 vs 4-5

People have preferences. I hate 343i's art design and direction, always have (especially given that they attempted to retcon Bungie's art direction in Halo 4 and act like it was always that terrible simply out of spite and the need to say 'this is ours now'). The Spartans look like Power Rangers, the actual suits look like cheap plastic Chinese knockoffs and the only person who came out of the redesign looking halfway decent was the Chief.

Most people agree with me, given that the complaints were enough to force 343i to go back to 'classic era' designs for Infinite.

Don't like my preferences? Feel free to ignore what some random dude on the Internet does or does not care about. Pretty simple.

Sorry. I really get mad at people who bust 343’s chops for reasons like:

“Cause they make bad games.”

Your reason was valid. Thanks!

BeastSprayz wrote:

GrapeJuice13360 wrote:

I personally dislike anything that doesn't have a visor, and I especially dislike the Nightfall helmet, mostly because its a crappy rip-off of the Helljumper ODST helmet. ODSTs deserve better >:(

Helljumper is just superior and for those that drop into hell definitely deserve better.

Amen brother

BeastSprayz wrote:

The Great Jenks wrote:

BeastSprayz wrote:

The Great Jenks wrote:

I am not sure which is my least favorite but war Master, seeker, FOTUS and defender are some of worst in my opinion

Any reason for why you listed those? As a side note, I like War Master as it is the Mjolnir suit that Headhunters post war usually use, it’s either War Master or Wrath, the EVA variant that is inspired by Emile’s design.

The helmet you are talking about is Wrath which I do like. War master has a visor that indents to make a face it looks dumb in my opinion.

Well some could argue Wrath looks dumb too, I mean is it not a face after all? The War Master Mjolnir armour is indented to look like a face for the intimidation factor, and personally I kinda like it more than Wrath, but it’s an opinion and we’re all entitled to one.

I think he means the visor is molded to look like a face, rather than having one engraved by the user. regardless, you made an opinion thread, acknowledging people have the right to that opinion, and then questioning that opinion. that does not add up at all. it looks like you got personally involved since you admit to liking the war master design. subjectivity does not require explanation. objectivity does.

For me, too many to list, mainly from H5. But when I read the title, the first one that came to mind was the Scout helmet from H3.

BeastSprayz wrote:

a copperrry cat wrote:

BeastSprayz wrote:

The Great Jenks wrote:

BeastSprayz wrote:

The Great Jenks wrote:

I am not sure which is my least favorite but war Master, seeker, FOTUS and defender are some of worst in my opinion

Any reason for why you listed those? As a side note, I like War Master as it is the Mjolnir suit that Headhunters post war usually use, it’s either War Master or Wrath, the EVA variant that is inspired by Emile’s design.

The helmet you are talking about is Wrath which I do like. War master has a visor that indents to make a face it looks dumb in my opinion.

Well some could argue Wrath looks dumb too, I mean is it not a face after all? The War Master Mjolnir armour is indented to look like a face for the intimidation factor, and personally I kinda like it more than Wrath, but it’s an opinion and we’re all entitled to one.

I think he means the visor is molded to look like a face, rather than having one engraved by the user. regardless, you made an opinion thread, acknowledging people have the right to that opinion, and then questioning that opinion. that does not add up at all. it looks like you got personally involved since you admit to liking the war master design. subjectivity does not require explanation. objectivity does.

For me, too many to list, mainly from H5. But when I read the title, the first one that came to mind was the Scout helmet from H3.

I’m questioning opinions to make a good discussion. I want to know why exactly he doesn’t like it as it conflicts with my thoughts. It’s not that their opinion is invalid, I just want to understand what they dislike about the helmet in discussion. I never downplay anyones opinions, I try to understand them.

That would be fine if it was just to understand their perspective, but not when you try to draw a comparison: "Well some could argue Wrath looks dumb too, I mean is it not a face after all?". Maybe it's just me, but at that point you are going further than just trying to understand a perspective, rather, you are trying to convince them otherwise of their subjectivity. Example: "I don't like pink, it looks dumb." "Well, some could argue Fuschia looks dumb too, I mean is it not a shade of pink after all?.". In the knife community we call this "second type of cool". You like it, or hate it, because you just do. Something about it just does not jive with you, but you may like something else that is very similar. That type o cool is off limits to criticize someone over because it is subjective. But, you can imagine he probably does not like it because of how the face is molded on, and it may make the helmet look cheesy. Asking the right question, worded the correct way makes all the difference, and now I'm giving lessons, lol, I'm sorry.

I do not like the H3 Scout helm because it looks like a duck, is really pointy, rounded off, not really intimidating looking type deal. Looks like paper machet bolted on. The proportions just look wrong. This one though looks cool https://twitter.com/AbiSV1/status/1093116160902615040 IDK if the dimensions are exactly the same, but this one looks more slim lined.

a copperrry cat wrote:

BeastSprayz wrote:

a copperrry cat wrote:

BeastSprayz wrote:

The Great Jenks wrote:

BeastSprayz wrote:

The Great Jenks wrote:

I am not sure which is my least favorite but war Master, seeker, FOTUS and defender are some of worst in my opinion

Any reason for why you listed those? As a side note, I like War Master as it is the Mjolnir suit that Headhunters post war usually use, it’s either War Master or Wrath, the EVA variant that is inspired by Emile’s design.

The helmet you are talking about is Wrath which I do like. War master has a visor that indents to make a face it looks dumb in my opinion.

Well some could argue Wrath looks dumb too, I mean is it not a face after all? The War Master Mjolnir armour is indented to look like a face for the intimidation factor, and personally I kinda like it more than Wrath, but it’s an opinion and we’re all entitled to one.

I think he means the visor is molded to look like a face, rather than having one engraved by the user. regardless, you made an opinion thread, acknowledging people have the right to that opinion, and then questioning that opinion. that does not add up at all. it looks like you got personally involved since you admit to liking the war master design. subjectivity does not require explanation. objectivity does.

For me, too many to list, mainly from H5. But when I read the title, the first one that came to mind was the Scout helmet from H3.

I’m questioning opinions to make a good discussion. I want to know why exactly he doesn’t like it as it conflicts with my thoughts. It’s not that their opinion is invalid, I just want to understand what they dislike about the helmet in discussion. I never downplay anyones opinions, I try to understand them.

That would be fine if it was just to understand their perspective, but not when you try to draw a comparison: "Well some could argue Wrath looks dumb too, I mean is it not a face after all?". Maybe it's just me, but at that point you are going further than just trying to understand a perspective, rather, you are trying to convince them otherwise of their subjectivity. Example: "I don't like pink, it looks dumb." "Well, some could argue Fuschia looks dumb too, I mean is it not a shade of pink after all?.". In the knife community we call this "second type of cool". You like it, or hate it, because you just do. Something about it just does not jive with you, but you may like something else that is very similar. That type o cool is off limits to criticize someone over because it is subjective. But, you can imagine he probably does not like it because of how the face is molded on, and it may make the helmet look cheesy. Asking the right question, worded the correct way makes all the difference, and now I'm giving lessons, lol, I'm sorry.

I do not like the H3 Scout helm because it looks like a duck, is really pointy, rounded off, not really intimidating looking type deal. Looks like paper machet bolted on. The proportions just look wrong. This one though looks cool https://twitter.com/AbiSV1/status/1093116160902615040 IDK if the dimensions are exactly the same, but this one looks more slim lined.

It may have been wording, but I used those words to try draw out a conversation. I was not dismissing his subjectivity in the subject, just trying to understand. I personally like War Master and Wrath, and in the lore they do both fill a similar purpose, so understanding is all I was trying to do.

Modern Rogue, It's a shame since IMO they haven't done the Rogue right since H3. :(

Reach's Hazop looked like a Bumblebee knockoff to me.

there's a LOT of helmets i have a distaste for, but argonaut, nomad, argus, wetwork, achilles are a very small amount
probably argonaut

Seeker and FOTUS