Why has every one given up on halo so quickly? I still think it's an amazing game series. 343 shouldn't be given up on so quickly, especially if they are in control of halo at the moment. 343 needs support from the fans, to be directed and helped to reach a halo that every one likes. Halo 5 is different from other halos but it's not bad game, however it's that difference that fans didn't like and I believe halo can be placed back on the right tracks to a series that everyone enjoys.Why has everyone given up quickly? cause they have good reasons to do so,its been like this for a long time man.Halo 4,MCC and Halo 5,plus Halo Wars 2 Pay to Win Blitz mode should be reasons enough for ya.When you have a established successsful gameplay formula unique to where mostly every other games has sprint/advanced mechanics that niche/core audience of Halo loved the game.
I'm not sure what you consider "constructive" criticism, but I don't see it in your comment or those who share your opinions (hereafter referred to as the Disgruntled). There's nothing useful for making the games better, just more, "make the next game my way or the Disgruntled won't play it". A multi-million-dollar franchise, spanning the globe can't tailor its games to your specific preferences to the exclusion of the rest of the people in the world, making the demands of the Disgruntled absolutely absurd.
Bungie made 3 Halo games with the best resources available to them. Technology was just advanced enough, and the games fell at just the right time for them to be explosive successes (lightning in a bottle). Halo Reach is proof that Bungie was not tied to one set of game mechanics as the Disgruntled like to claim it was. Halo advanced with new technology becoming available. There's great irony in a franchise that started with "Combat Evolved" being asked to developmentally stagnate by a small group of Disgruntled.
Then like Halo 4(Reach was BUNGIES) last Halo game so lets not focus on hat,so moving on.343 instead of continuing on that sucessful formula of Halo 3,decided to completely changed everything people loved bout OG Halos
Nope, I'm not letting you gloss over Reach, because it is one of the biggest wrenches in your whole narrative, disproving the point you're trying to make. This is not a case of a new company throwing out what the old one did. Halo was on a trajectory under Bungie, and 343I is continuing with that.
a pay to win(ish)req system of course some will give up.Why would they wanna stick around
Casual observation of Halo is sufficient to see that it is not "pay to win". The Month of Mythic was a mistake, but otherwise the microtransactions were quarrantined behind gameplay mechanics which allowed those of us who never spent a dime on microtransactions to keep up with everyone else. I played for several months until money got tight and I let my Gold Account expire, and I rarely used any Requisitions at all besides the scoped BR with Hard Light ammo, and the AR with scope and Hard Light ammo. With those I was able to maintain a positive K/D ratio for my entire online experience.
Quote:Halo 5 is a bad Halo game,but its an ok FPS game.
Nope, the Disgruntled's definition of what makes a good "Halo Game" is not in accordance with the games creators or anyone else on planet Earth.
Quote:Gameplay needs to go back to original
Back to what I said above, the Disgruntled are of the delusion that their numbers are greater, or that their opinions mean more than everyone else. Somehow the Disgruntled can't seem to understand that most of us don't want to go back to never breaking out of a slow, lumbering walk like we were constrained to in Halo 3.
Quote:People linger on to give 343 feedback,you interpret it as "BAD cause they dont agree with things YOU like."Fans want the right expectations"so cause i want OG to com bk thats a bad one,so if i want oddball thats bad, or for them to make a good coherent story,a satisfying progression/unlock system.
No, I call it nonconstructive because it is nonconstructive. The Disgruntled are nagging 343I with demands that they're never going to get, because it isn't in 343I's financial interest to go back to clunky game mechanics that would still be panned by the Disgruntled for not having the right nostalgic "feel" of the originals, regardless of what 343I does with it.
And Halo's story is coherent. Halo 5's mistake was making it in such a way that the backstory was found in comics and novels instead of the game itself, which was completely fine for people like myself who've read them all, but people like yourself, who only consume the franchise through the games aren't willing to do a little research and simply assert that the story isn't coherent.
Quote:You say nagging I say its good we nagging cause they need it badly, good,bad,constructing feedback(as long as its in respectful manner).
Nagging doesn't help anyone. Nagging is just irritating, either disheartening the recipient, negatively affecting their performance, or provoking a backlash where the recipient completely writes off the nagging as background noise and no longer takes notice of it. The Disgruntled are background noise with delusions of prominence. (with all due respect)