Search

  1. 1
  2. ...
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...

Forums


  1. Pictures look good, but couldn't get the website to work. You sure it is halovantage.com ?

  2. Application/Web Site title: Forge.World Lobby Browser Description: The Halo Community has been clambering to get access to a Customs Lobby Browser, to make it easier to find active matches. Many LFG type sites have come and gone, but they're all...

  3. Maybe it is really TotalEnemySpartanKills, and it counts betrayals as part of TotalKills?

  4. The API has been pretty disappointing because of this issue. Not only is it impossible to get a users unlocked/locked reqs, the API doesn't even give any info on how to find requisition ids. Luckily someone else found out how. I'm really hoping...

  5. Yep, I couldn't agree more. I was really excited at the prospect of being able to use the site, but couldn't, in good conscience, support it, given the security concerns. Would love to see these added to the API, so that we can avoid this...

  6. Ball: (Undocumented) Probably for the ball game types coming out. You can see all the new/old medals here. The API appears to be reporting a "Goal" classification, not Ball, which is what I'm assuming you meant. { "name"...

  7. Hey guys, I seem to have found another one - though it might be something to do with the new patch, but it's an older match (2015-12-03) Medal ID is 2150057864, saw it in match 8120c108-6faf-4b39-8350-bedc8f9cbdae Cheers! Bumping this because...

  8. Probably Betrayals. They wouldn't count as suicides, and likely don't count as Kills either, but should count as negative points.

  9. Hello guys, Loving the whole public API and currently trying to get used to it. Heres a few things I've stumbled upon, 1)Time of match, is it possible to see when a match had started/ended? I can see duration and the date, but the time after says...

  10. As it stands right now, if you have Customs matches that use custom maps or gametypes, the Metadata Map Variant APIs return 404s for those guids. It would be great if we could get the names, descriptions, creators, etc. for those items as well. Though...

  1. 1
  2. ...
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...